Image source |
It's rare that I come across a Places-To-See! list on which I've seen so very few of the places.
46 Places to Go in 2013
- Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Marseille, France
- Nicaragua
- Accra, Ghana
- Bhutan
- Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Houston, TX, United States
- Rossland, BC, Canada
- New Delhi, India
- Istanbul, Turkey
- Singapore
- Montenegro
- White Salmon River, WA, United States
- Hvar, Croatia
- Mongolia
- The Big Island, HI, United States
- Philippines
- Vernazza, Italy
- The Kimberley, Australia
- Ningxia, China
- The Adirondacks, NY, United States
- Oslo, Norway
- Constantia, South Africa
- Lithuania
- Burgos, Spain
- Lens, France
- Changbaishan, China
- Porto, Portugal
- Puerto Rico
- Koh Phangan, Thailand
- Kalpitiya, Sri Lanka
- Jackson Hole, WY, United States
- Bangkok, Thailand
- The Jeseniky, Czech Republic
- Waiheke, New Zealand
- Yucatan, Mexico
- Charlevoix, Quebec
- Pecs, Hungary
- Republic of Congo
- Ireland
- Getaria, Spain
- Mergui Islands, Myanmar
- The Falkland Islands
- Washington, DC, United States
- Casablanca, Morocco
- Paris, France
What I dislike about the list: I've added country information for each destination, but the original list is a confusing mix-and-match of cities and countries, regions and specific locations. For example, the Kimberley region in Australia is bigger than Germany, while White Salmon River seems an oddly exact choice on a list that includes such broad travel destinations as Nicaragua and Mongolia.
Nevertheless, it's thought-provoking catalogue of travel destinations.
Would I have included Bhutan on my travel bucket list before reading the Times?
Perhaps not...
Then again, I wouldn't have picked Houston, either.
Completing the list: Out of the 46 selected destinations, my somewhat anemic tally is 2.5
(DC, Puerto Rico, and a drive-by of Jackson Hole)
How many of these places have you visited?
How many are on your travel bucket list?
What location(s) would you add to the list?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Penny for your thoughts?